The Rumble in the Jungle. The Thriller in Manila. Tyson versus Holyfield. Mayweather’s and Pacquiao’s ‘Fight of the Century. McGregor versus Khabib. The list could go on. Surely no fight in history, however, would be comparable to Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg going toe-to-toe in the ring. It wouldn’t be the best fight, and it probably won’t even happen, but just imagine: two of the world’s richest men, both enigmatic personalities, both heads of controversial social media sites, both, by my estimate, real weirdos. It would be a tech billionaire battle for the ages. In theory, we’ve got a fighting medium. Musk tweeted: “I’m up for a cage match if he is lol”. In theory, we’ve got two willing participants. Zuckerberg screenshotted Musk’s tweet and posted it on his own Instagram platform (Musk’s Twitter can’t get all the action) with the caption “SEND ME LOCATION.” Alex Heath at The Verge reported Zuckerberg was indeed serious. Musk promptly tweeted, “Vegas Octagon”. Seemingly, we’ve got all the necessary ingredients to make this fight happen. What is not yet known is the level of genuine animosity the two have toward each other. They are professional rivers, and Musk has ramped up the anti-Zuck, anti-Meta rhetoric since taking over Twitter, retweeting an article accusing his rival CEO of “buying” the 2020 election and describing him as “extremely partisan”. (The irony.) Musk has also fuelled claims that Zuckerberg is on a quest for world domination and warned: “I’m sure Earth can’t wait to be exclusively under Zuck’s thumb with no other options. At least it will be ‘sane’.” That latest quip was in response to Meta’s plans to launch a new app, directly competing with Twitter. Codenamed by Meta as Project 92, it was described by the company’s chief product officer, Chris Cox, as “our response to Twitter”, adding users could transfer followers and information straight from Instagram. He then threw a subtle jibe at Musk, claiming: “Meta’s been hearing from creators and public figures who are interested in having a platform that is sanely run.” Whether or not they dislike one another enough to try and pound the other’s face in, I’m not sure, but it seems fair to assume they’re not great mates. It also seems fair to assume with that much money, that many shareholders, and that much at stake, stepping into an Octagon is a pretty risky move, and the fight may well be averted.
Musk vs Zuckerberg | Who wins in a fight?
In one of the most remarkably believable stories of 2023 to date, two of the world’s richest men and CEOs of competing social media giants, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, have agreed to a cage fight. Who will win?
The Rumble in the Jungle. The Thriller in Manila. Tyson versus Holyfield. Mayweather’s and Pacquiao’s ‘Fight of the Century. McGregor versus Khabib. The list could go on. Surely no fight in history, however, would be comparable to Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg going toe-to-toe in the ring. It wouldn’t be the best fight, and it probably won’t even happen, but just imagine: two of the world’s richest men, both enigmatic personalities, both heads of controversial social media sites, both, by my estimate, real weirdos. It would be a tech billionaire battle for the ages. In theory, we’ve got a fighting medium. Musk tweeted: “I’m up for a cage match if he is lol”. In theory, we’ve got two willing participants. Zuckerberg screenshotted Musk’s tweet and posted it on his own Instagram platform (Musk’s Twitter can’t get all the action) with the caption “SEND ME LOCATION.” Alex Heath at The Verge reported Zuckerberg was indeed serious. Musk promptly tweeted, “Vegas Octagon”. Seemingly, we’ve got all the necessary ingredients to make this fight happen. What is not yet known is the level of genuine animosity the two have toward each other. They are professional rivers, and Musk has ramped up the anti-Zuck, anti-Meta rhetoric since taking over Twitter, retweeting an article accusing his rival CEO of “buying” the 2020 election and describing him as “extremely partisan”. (The irony.) Musk has also fuelled claims that Zuckerberg is on a quest for world domination and warned: “I’m sure Earth can’t wait to be exclusively under Zuck’s thumb with no other options. At least it will be ‘sane’.” That latest quip was in response to Meta’s plans to launch a new app, directly competing with Twitter. Codenamed by Meta as Project 92, it was described by the company’s chief product officer, Chris Cox, as “our response to Twitter”, adding users could transfer followers and information straight from Instagram. He then threw a subtle jibe at Musk, claiming: “Meta’s been hearing from creators and public figures who are interested in having a platform that is sanely run.” Whether or not they dislike one another enough to try and pound the other’s face in, I’m not sure, but it seems fair to assume they’re not great mates. It also seems fair to assume with that much money, that many shareholders, and that much at stake, stepping into an Octagon is a pretty risky move, and the fight may well be averted.